We explore the best way to initiate coverage from setting the stage, through to first contact and vetting the initiation report.
In the relationship between an IRO and an analyst, the process of initiating coverage stands out.
In the relationship between an IRO and an analyst, the process of initiating coverage stands out. Experienced IROs know the crucial period when a new analyst is being introduced to the company and senior management can not only set the tone for how the analyst views the company, but also sets the framework for how the analyst works with the IRO and the company on an ongoing basis. It’s a mix of courtship and negotiation on both sides – and it should begin even before the first conversation. And as a small-cap German healthcare IRO points out: ‘For initiation and major fundamentals, more time is allotted than for quarterly updates.’
What if the analyst does not seem a good t? Globally, only a small number of IROs (7 percent) report actively discouraging an analyst from picking up coverage.
As one US-based mid-cap consumer sector IRO reports, added coverage makes it ‘difficult to manage in terms of time, message and corporate access, so I am very honest with analysts prior to launching coverage that they will receive little corporate access.’
A second consistent theme is quality of the research effort or concern over the ethics of a particular analyst. Another US IR professional from a large-cap industrials company describes a previous relationship with one particular analyst ‘who clearly was following us in name only... mainly to be able to be on CNBC if it were to call.’ The third reason IROs give for discouraging coverage relates to the lack of influence or value the analyst or rm would bring to the IR program. A mid-cap Canadian utility IRO describes a ‘deal syndicate already crowded, [with] marginal incremental banking, trading or investor audience value to be gained.’